
What Do 2026 U.S. Privacy Rules Mean for B2B CRM and AI Workflows?
By Judy · November 11, 2026
Absen's Sales Director shares how the company rebuilt its sales value by transforming the Lead-to-Cash process and unifying strategy, workflows, and systems for industry-leading efficiency.
Kai · November 11, 2026 · 12 min read
Share this article with someone who’d enjoy it.

In today's ultra-competitive display industry, more than 95% of the global supply chain is concentrated. Companies are no longer just competing domestically—they're expanding aggressively across international markets. In this intense landscape, breaking through the noise, building a resilient brand, and securing market share have become Absen's ongoing priorities. Below is a personal reflection by Absen's Sales Director.
When I first returned from a business region to headquarters in 2020 to take charge of sales management, I was initially resistant. As someone who had long led sales teams on the front lines, I had always felt that sales management departments often made impractical demands, adding burdens rather than support. But after more than four years of experience, I gradually came to understand the deeper value and meaning of this role.
Sales management spans far more than expected—it includes strategic planning, budget breakdown, performance assessment, sales strategy formulation, process development, organizational structure building, incentive design, and even cultural atmosphere. Different companies define it differently: it can be a command center, a diagnostic hub, an operational engine, or a support platform. Some focus on basic business support; others manage the entire process; the most capable teams align directly with corporate strategy. Ultimately, its role evolves with a company's development stage.
Digital transformation is a complex, interconnected system-wide initiative, and sales management is just one crucial component. The transformation process must closely align with the business model, market environment, customer characteristics, competitor dynamics, and internal company DNA to define a clear direction and methodology. From strategy anchoring, process optimization, and organizational structure adaptation to capacity building, each link must work in concert to realize full-chain, coordinated transformation.
A common question we hear: “Where should we start if we want to implement a new system?” Absen's experience suggests the first step must be clarifying the business plan. Only with a clearly defined business direction can the system roadmap be aligned. If all you need is basic customer and opportunity tracking, a lightweight system may suffice. But if the goal is to manage all operations through the system, then the business strategy must be solid—without it, the system becomes a castle in the air. Absen has always followed the logic of “institutionalize management, formalize policies into workflows, and systemize the workflows.” This sequence must not be reversed, and no system should be built by backfitting policy.
Taking Absen's Sales Management Department as an example: It first aligns with the company's strategic direction and breaks that down into actionable strategies, driving departments and systems to act accordingly. The Sales Management team must then assess whether existing workflows can support those strategies. If gaps are found, processes are optimized or rebuilt, and business rules are updated accordingly—with full monitoring throughout execution. If execution issues arise, the problem is either a loophole in the system or a skills gap in the sales team. In such cases, job qualification evaluations and targeted enablement programs are launched. This closed-loop management ensures operations are both streamlined and effective.
In the process of digitalization—especially for sales management—sales systems and priorities vary significantly across different stages of business development:
Though the focus may shift, all three stages share a common goal: to empower frontline teams through refined sales management and enhance overall combat strength. Therefore, digitalization must follow a gradual path:
This is a more secure approach—otherwise, the company risks falling into a vicious cycle of “building, reworking, and discarding” systems repeatedly.
Absen's path toward digital transformation has not been smooth. There were setbacks and hard lessons learned along the way. Since 2007, the company began introducing systems to replace manual tasks in basic functions. This phase was entirely driven by business operations—paper-based processes became too inefficient and risky as the workforce grew, so adopting systems became a necessity.
From 2015 to 2017, the company entered a function-driven stage. Departments began requesting system support to boost their efficiency. Thanks to Absen's strong IT capabilities, many systems were launched, either developed in-house or via external partners. However, by 2018, problems surfaced: serious silos between systems were limiting collaboration. In 2019, when the team attempted to map strategy to digital processes, they discovered that many systems were fundamentally incompatible. That's because early development hadn't accounted for data integration or process alignment between systems, making later consolidation extremely difficult. As a result, during the 2019 restructuring, they had to scrap and rebuild—most of the early investment was wasted.
Determined to learn from failure, the company officially began its process architecture in 2019. The top priority: build out the LTC (Lead to Cash) process while advancing IPD (Integrated Product Development) and IT system integration. In the manufacturing industry, these two core processes are business lifelines. A total of 16 key workflows were planned, with varying implementation timelines. The LTC process saw initial success by 2020.
This process design gave Absen a clear direction: don't optimize just one link or department—create full-chain integration. Understand how information and approvals connect across workflows. In late 2019, over 60 Huawei experts were brought in to assist, a massive investment. However, after 18 months, only 9 experts remained. Not due to incompetence—but because Absen differs from Huawei in company size, customer tiers, and project scale. The processes had to be tailored accordingly.
For instance, Huawei's project initiation process is rigorous and complex—but for Absen's typical $300,000 projects, spending a week preparing documentation and two days reporting was not realistic. So Absen refined the model: business leaders became process “owners,” while experts provided technical support. Leaders not only used the processes daily but understood the details and held execution responsibility—helping ensure processes were actually followed.
Most enterprise business frameworks share common structures—focused on R&D, customer engagement, service, delivery, supply chain, logistics, and warehousing. Absen's synchronization of 16 major business workflows and 18 interconnected systems dramatically boosted efficiency—achieving speeds four to five times faster than peers. This leap was made possible by the solid foundation of integrated processes and systems.
Absen's journey of digital transformation has been a long exploration—from fragmented efforts to a structured and holistic system. Its continued leadership in the display industry is largely attributed to the forward-looking push by CEO Ding Chongbin. He previously led the company's IT department, and since joining in 2007, has been actively driving Absen's digital vision.
At the beginning, the team questioned the need for digitalization, believing paper-based contracts were sufficient. Although multiple systems were later launched, they lacked a unified perspective. Not until 2019 did the organization truly develop a systematic understanding.
That same year, Absen invited a consulting firm to guide its strategic planning and set a bold three-year revenue target of USD $1.3 billion. It was at this moment that the entire organization realized: digital transformation was no longer optional—it had become the core pillar to support future growth. This catalyzed the shift into a fast-track phase of structured, company-wide transformation.
Looking back at Absen's digitalization journey, it clearly evolved in three stages:
Previously, Absen's business processes were severely fragmented. Quotation documents and product details were stored in one system, while customer and opportunity data were in another. Sales managers relied on independent reporting tools, approvals ran through the OA system, logistics had its own system, and service had a separate one too. This lack of integration led to inefficiencies, especially in approvals.
In 2021, when I took over sales management, the company was undergoing organizational restructuring and shifting its strategy to a “big platform, small frontend” model. Previously, six regional heads had long tenures, made independent decisions, and handled relatively simple business focused on end customers in advertising and stage industries.
However, after 2019, rapid industry growth brought greater business complexity. Project sizes grew from hundreds of thousands to tens or even hundreds of millions of RMB, and new customer types like system integrators and contractors emerged.
As a result, newly appointed regional heads often faced tough decisions—either relying on gut instinct or being paralyzed by insufficient information. The biggest business risks stemmed from this lack of structured process—when decisions depend solely on subjective judgment without clear rules. The most visible symptom was a sudden spike in accounts receivable and inventory, a direct consequence of missing or broken processes.
Faced with these challenges, the LTC transformation became a necessary move. LTC itself is a standard process framework, and Absen did not make major modifications to it—only adaptive adjustments tailored to the company's specific business needs. The core principle was to apply and tailor the framework based on real operational demands.
At the time, the company had a very clear goal: integrate sales and channel management to achieve end-to-end process control—from lead to opportunity to contract—through one unified system. The goal also included incorporating customer and channel information, streamlining order, installation, service, product management, and financial flows, and ultimately delivering real-time performance visibility.
Once the project went live, the results were significant: the win rate of major projects increased by 43%, and operational efficiencies in tasks such as partner self-service ordering, fast quoting (within 5 minutes), and contract approvals all improved substantially. Building on this, Absen set a new goal: since the company already had a leading process and a relatively mature business foundation, it should build on this to create an industry-leading, fully digital marketing and sales platform.
To achieve the above goals, after the system went live, Absen focused on solving three core issues:
The value of LTC transformation is not only reflected in improved efficiency but also profoundly impacts the quality of operations. Although Absen ranks third in the industry in revenue, it leads in net profit—mainly due to having the lowest accounts receivable and inventory levels in the industry. This is the true value of sales management: a mature process can significantly reduce bad debt and excessive inventory.
The outcomes of the transformation are evident in two dimensions:
While systems can greatly enhance efficiency, the prerequisite is to clearly define how business strategy translates into operations, establish the right mechanisms and processes, and only then bring it to life through IT systems.
Absen introduced the IPD (Integrated Product Development) framework in product management. Its core philosophy is to develop products with an investment mindset rather than merely responding passively to customer demands. For the group, product development must be based on precise judgment of both current and future market needs, aligned with China's technology innovation trends. It proactively explores technological breakthroughs and ultimately fulfills customer needs through tangible product offerings. These needs include both explicit customer feedback and hidden demands uncovered through internal research, all presented through product form.
Supply chain management is vital to Absen. Compared with the past focus on quality assurance during production and basic supplier management, today's supply chain management has evolved with richer meaning:
Given the engineering nature of its products, service is Absen's competitive moat. In the company's structure, the service unit operates as a standalone profit center—it must be strong enough to make customers willing to pay for its value. To achieve this, Absen productized every service offering, with clear pricing and value delivery. Differentiated service standards were first defined before pricing was set. A 3-tier service model ensures precise response time and all-scenario coverage, forming a service capability that's difficult to replicate.
“Self-illumination” is Absen's brand value proposition—just as its displays strive to present true colors, the company aims to operate with authenticity and integrity. This includes smart display, smart quality, smart branding, and smart service—all forming the spiritual foundation of the brand.
Absen adheres to three non-negotiable principles:
These are red lines. Any salesperson who violates them is dismissed immediately. This is also why Absen chose to operate through channels instead of directly—doing so avoids violating its values. Being truthful enhances communication efficiency, fosters trust, lowers compliance risks, and helps filter customers. With aligned values, long-term partnerships can form; when values clash, the company walks away. This is how Absen protects its pursuit of “integrity as a cornerstone, building a city on the hill.”

By Judy · November 11, 2026

By Judy · November 6, 2026

By Judy · November 4, 2026